The section of The Tin Drum between
pages 314 and 324 features a change in narrative structure in the novel. In
this section Oskar recounts a dialogue he has recorded of a visit he and
Bebra’s troupe made to the Atlantic seawall the night before the Allies’
European invasion. The action of writing down this event as a precise dialogue
echoes a theme within this section about looking back at the war and returning
from the war to civilian life—how do people pick up the pieces? Grass makes
connections between the built, concrete landscape (“these pillboxes will still
be standing because pillboxes always remain standing, even when everything else
collapses” [317]) and the way that memories, particularly those horrific
memories of war, remain long after the end.
The
Corporal Lankes presents the strongest example of this theme. Lankes tries to
make art out of the drudgery of building pillboxes: “I’m hoping to use my
knowledge working with cement when it’s over. Everything’s going to have to be
rebuilt back home” (314). This statement presents a complex concept about the
outcome of the war. To say that he will use his knowledge of cement when the
war is over implies a belief that he will survive, will go on to do a practical
everyman’s job—construction. However, to suggest that Germany will need to be rebuilt
speaks to a pessimistic outlook on the outcome of the war. As we learn, Lankes
is an artist who could never have become part of the Nazi Propaganda Corps because
“[his] stuff’s too oblique for present tastes” (316). However, if what Oskar is
doing by recording this conversation could be considered art—after all it is
part of a Nobel Prize winning novel—then what Lankes is doing is also
recording, creating art, by embedding his “Oblique Formations” (318) into the
bland, concrete walls of the enduring pillboxes. Lankes describes this art as
work that
One fine day a so-called
archaeologist will arrive and say to himself, What an artistically impoverished
age…then he’ll run across [Bunkers 4-7], he’ll see my structurally oblique
formations, and say to himself: Let’s have a look at this. Interesting. One
might almost say magical; menacing, yet imbued with striking spirituality.
(318)
The
connection Grass seems to make is that Lankes will go on to make art after the
war, since he is an artist. Yet he will work art out of the cement that
represents this hard, brutal Normandy front, a front where frolicking nuns are
mowed down by machineguns, where puppies are filled into the cement out of
hardened, superstition and summarize this experience as, “Mystical, Barbaric,
Bored” (318). The idea of encasing small, innocent animals into the cement also
represents the way in which the soldiers literally build a perilous concrete
wall around the soft territory, the homeland they are to preserve and protect,
and metaphorically, an impenetrable barrier around that softened vulnerability
that makes them human. Grass extends this metaphor when Lankes states, “Most of
my comrades are country boys. And even today, when they build a house or a barn
or a village church, they feel they have to wall something living” (315). Grass
suggests from this statement that this formation, abiotic and heavy, comes back
home with these soldiers after the war.
For Grass
to suggest that Lankes wants to put his experiences to work in the form of
architecture is to say that the act of making art is as important, as essential
as construction to the foundations of civilization. In recording memory, Grass
implies that Oskar and Lankes take the oblique formation that is memory in our
head and give it solid, visible form. To put this idea within the context of
Oskar’s art and within the context of Lankes as an artist thrust into the war,
Grass seems to suggest that these ravaged soldier-souls, these images and
memories, become a ruthlessly ugly art in themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment