When I first began Waiting for
the Barbarians, I was extremely perturbed with the lack of certainty about
where, exactly, the settlement is. Going into the book I assumed, based on the
origins of J.M. Coetzee, that this would be a novel about the colonization of
Africa. However, the description of the girl’s eyes and hair and the constant
references to “the frontier” recall allusions to Native Americans and the American
Frontier; even the artwork on the cover of the book suggests that we are
reading a story of the colonization of the Americas, or perhaps Asia. What also
bothered me was the namelessness of “the girl”: the magistrate’s
quasi-concubine.
As I read on, however, the
namelessness of the actual location of the settlement and the girl mattered
less to me because there are countless victims of colonization, and that seems
to be the point of the novel; perhaps it does not matter where this particular
story takes place because there are so many stories similar to it. What matters
are the true horrors of colonization: torture, murder, rape, displacement,
genocide, etc. Even the magistrate does not receive a name; he is a, somewhat,
complacent participant of imperialism—at least until things directly affect his
own wellbeing. Like the “barbarians” there are nameless proponents of
colonization who, while they may recognize the immorality of a nation’s subjugation
of a native population, still continue to perpetuate the dominating force.
Regardless of which specific settlement we happen to be looking at—whether it is
in the Americas, Africa, or Asia—Coetzee is able to show the true face of
colonization.
No comments:
Post a Comment