“You’ll
have to take my word for it…”(34) This line captures the tone of the work, the
reader is totally dependent on a man with a Peter Pan-like obsession, who is
locked up in an insane asylum. The immense level of detail given to us is
undermined by the idea that the stories are contained within a tin drum. What
is real and what has simply been created is unknown, we have to simply trust
the author and try to follow the scrambled sense in which he presents himself.
This leads
to a slightly deceptive nature within Oskar’s family story. It seems as if the
story being told is one that could be altered by Oskar on a whim, for he
constantly alludes to the nature of storytelling, and how some stories may have
different endings, yet he chooses the ones that he believes. The action of
cutting up photos of himself and his friend in hopes of “creating new, and we
hoped happier, creatures” captures this idea of an altered past. The fact that he is locked within an insane
asylum also begs to question the legitimacy of his stories, his wish to remain
a child affects how he presents the what has happened to him and those who came before him.
.Koljaiczek embodies the deceptive that
is mirrored by Oskar. Koljaiczek, when marrying Ana took over the life of the
deceased Wranka, left behind the days of arson. The presentation of the two
sides of the same man is slightly confusing for Oskar portrays them as two
completely different beings, as if he really did change. Koljaiczek once burned
down a mill, and now as Wranka he throws away matches leaving his family in
darkness. This can be compared to the way the point of view within the story
flips back and forth in a dizzying manner with the narrator and the author intermingling, leaving the reader wondering who is presenting the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment